Extend Hyperlinq() feature

Comments

• Options

  JoeAlbahari

  January 2018

  How would this work? Would it be like new Hyperlinq (() => Util.ReadLine ("test").Dump(), "test")?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Options

  psommer

  January 2018 edited January 2018

  I know I can do it this way. But this is not exactly what I mean.. What I am talking about is this:

  var html1 = "<script>
    function button1_Click() {
      var value1 = JSON
        .stringify({
        text1: document
        .getElementById('text1')
        .value,
        text2: document
        .getElementById('text2')
        .value
      });
  
      window
        .external
        .RunUserAction(0,
  value1,
        false);
    }
  </script>
  <div>
  <label for='text1'>
    Text #1:
  </label>
  <input type='text' id='text1' />
  </div>
  <div>
  <label for='text2'>
    Text #2:
  </label>
  <input type='text' id='text2' />
  </div>
  <div>
  <button onclick='button1_Click();'>
    Test #1
  </button>
  </div>
  <hr/>";
  
  Util
    .RawHtml("<style> a.hidden { display: none; }</style>")
    .Dump();
  
  (new Hyperlinq((value) => { ... JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<SomeType>(value); ... }, ".")
    {
      CssClass = "hidden"
    }).Dump();
  
  Util
    .RawHtml(html1)
    .Dump();

  This way would be possible to build complex html forms to gather some LINQPad query parameters (for example) directly in results pane.. And I am pretty sure, that many LINQPad users would appreciate this feature.
  
  PS: If there will be option to identify Hyperlinq action with some string Id too (not only position) then the call from html could be ..RunUserAction('myAction1'...) and this will be really cool

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter